7B.3    Testing and Evaluation of the Hybrid 4D EnVar GSI for 3-km High Resolution Regional Applications

 

Zhou, Chunhua, Hui Shao, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Ming Hu, and Jeff Beck, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Earth Systems Research Laboratory

 

As a number of operational centers have implemented four-dimensional Ensemble-Variational (4D EnVar) Data Assimilation (DA) for their global models, the Developmental Testbed Center (DTC) continues to conduct testing and evaluation of the GSI (Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation) 4D hybrid EnVar system for regional 3-km High Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR), as part of the efforts to improve the convective scale and cloud resolving numerical weather predictions at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earth System Research Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL).

Due to computational constraint, the operational HRRR 3km domain has been reduced from the CONUS (Continental US) to the central US. The period for the testing and evaluation is set to be September 3-9 of 2016, with hourly update of the initial and boundary conditions from the retrospective 13-km Rapid Refresh (RAP) runs. In addition to the experiments with the hybrid GSI three-dimensional EnVar (3D EnVar) as in the operational HRRR configurations, the hybrid 4D EnVar is applied to the reduced HRRR domain to investigate whether the 4D hybrid EnVar system improves upon the performance of the benchmark HRRR. Two-hours pre-forecast runs from each cycle are conducted to provide GSI backgrounds at three different time levels (t-1hr, t and t+1hr) to match the observations in three time bins. The 80-member global ensemble forecasts at three time levels provide time-variant, flow dependent background errors to the GSI in addition to the climatology background errors. Preliminary results suggest that the hybrid 4D EnVar GSI analysis gives better match between the observations and the HRRR background than the 3D EnVar in wind and humidity. Additional experiments with regional 3-km ensemble forecasts in the hybrid 3D EnVar as compared to the 3D EnVar using the low-resolution GFS ensemble suggests the potential benefit of applying high resolution regional ensembles in the 4D EnVar for better background error representative and therefore better forecasts.